When we first met Chris and Lucy in their lounge room to discuss their project, what immediately stood out was how open they were to a genuine design process.
Their backyard was dominated by a large but problematic Poinciana tree. We jokingly referred to the project as “To Tree or Not to Tree” while we explored two design options: work around the tree by lifting and building underneath, or remove it to allow for a more flexible extension.
Ordinarily, we would lean towards preserving the tree – our practice name suggests as much. However, in this case, the tree had caused significant damage to underground pipes and imposed serious limitations on an already sloping, irregular site. Sadly, it had to go.
Rather than lifting the house, we extended it – respecting its modest elevation and allowing this character-filled corner of Annerley to retain its familiar presence. In place of the tree, we introduced a pool courtyard that allowed the new extension to step up with the site’s natural topography. This opened up views towards the eucalypts across the road and allowed precious northern winter sunlight to penetrate deep into the home.
In recognition of the original tree’s value to the streetscape, Chris and Lucy invested in a beautiful Dwarf Gum for their front garden – bringing shade and beauty to a street enjoyed daily by commuters, churchgoers, and patrons of the beloved Billy Cart Café. The new backyard features newly planted trees, an edible garden, and vegetation to support bees and birds.
We’re absolutely delighted with the outcome of this project. It embodies many of the values we hold dear: well-built, thoughtfully scaled homes that prioritise greenery, low energy use, and a strong connection to both environment and community.
This rich and rewarding project began with a simple question: could what was lost be justified by what could be gained? We lost a tree but we gained a home that honours its past, responds sensitively to its site, and looks confidently to the future.
This rich and rewarding project began with a simple question: could what was lost be justified by what could be gained? We lost a tree but we gained a home that honours its past, responds sensitively to its site, and looks confidently to the future.
